Leadership Lab: STI Degree Candidates' Leadership Essays
SANS Technology Institute's mission is to develop the leaders of the
future for the information security industry. One of our admission
requirements is that an applicant complete an essay describing
leadership qualities they have demonstrated in the past.
View Archives »
- Leadership Essay SANS Technology Institute - Feb 17th, 2009
Leadership Essay SANS Technology Institute
Feb 17th, 2009
By Algis Kibirkstis
Leadership in the information systems security world can cover a
multitude of aspects and may also take on many different forms.
While qualities such as demonstrable competence, integrity, the
ability to delegate, communication skills and perseverance – not
to mention an almost fanatical sense of passionate enthusiasm –
are commonly found in today’s successful infosec leader, other
traits are developed and demonstrated based on the working environments
to which one is exposed. The successful leader is one that can
drive requirements and objectives to their successful fruition, all
while respecting business needs and corporate culture.
The telephony industry is one such environment. Due to
contractually defined “five nines” expectations, they are
historically sensitive to availability issues and would commonly go to
great lengths to safeguard that promise to the marketplace.
One of the greatest challenges met by telephony over the last decade
has been the inevitable and progressive migration from closed private
networks towards the open un-trusted telecommunications network of the
Internet, for this necessitated a fundamental change in the way they
view their production environment, but this change did not come
easily. Their operating systems and network configurations, once
protected by restricted physical access and obscure protocol
implementations, had become extremely vulnerable once exposed to
hostile surroundings. The need to consider confidentiality and
integrity along with availability was difficult to assimilate for many
old-school telephony archetypes, for in the past availability simply
trumped all, and anything new that could jeopardize service
availability could be summarily dropped in order to limit perceived
risk to the core business – including the introduction of basic
security-related mechanisms.
But times had to change. Working in a team to develop
bleeding-edge telco-grade server systems, I was asked to make sense of
a shopping list of security requirements coming from a high-profile
customer. After gaining support from a receptive group of middle
and senior managers, I was given the opportunity to lead a team to
develop a comprehensive standards-based strategy for safeguarding the
system and its assets, one that could be tuned and reused by other
research & development teams in the company.
Starting small with an eager teammate, I was able to secure our
attendance to a string of three SANS conferences over a period of 9
months, where we received invaluable training in different aspects of
information systems security. During this time, as my colleague
developed strategies and procedures for implementing and configuring
operating systems and utilities, I provided guidance and prepared a
security rule-set foundation that could provide the direction in
developing more secure products, in a format and in language adapted to
the culture and operations of the organization. I also spent a
significant amount of time driving the program by evangelizing, raising
awareness and networking with peers from other groups and departments,
in order to come up with a strategy that could be supported in the
short-term by consensus, if not by corporate policy.
Once the next product development cycle came up, I sat down with my
colleague to hash out a man-hour estimate that withstood a tremendous
amount of scrutiny from archetypes resisting change. My group
then took on two interns who helped us implement, test, integrate,
audit and document the delivery of the first product release at our
company that addressed security as part of overall system design and
development. The results exceeded expectations: we delivered on
time and on budget, and the few trouble tickets we had received during
system testing were quickly and effectively resolved. The
rollback procedures that had been developed to quell persistent
concerns were tested and deemed effective, but were never required once
in production.
When our security-related progress was presented to a group consisting
of various leads of other product development projects and the
high-profile customer, my initiative was singled out as a model on how
to address security in future projects, in that we respected the intent
of customer requirements while also taking on the responsibility to
develop and implement a comprehensive security plan for our product.


