Leadership Lab: Intellectual Property Series
This series of essays can help the IT manager learn how to identify and protect intellectual property and intangible assets.
View Archives »
- Valuation of Intellectual Property Case Study - IPWatchdog.com - Sep 29th, 2009
Valuation of Intellectual Property Case Study - IPWatchdog.com
Sep 29th, 2009
By Stephen Northcutt
Valuation of Intellectual Property Case Study - IPWatchdog.com
I was quite surprised when this press release came into my inbox:
"Since 1999 IPWatchdog.com has provided individuals, small businesses
and entrepreneurs with information to help them understand all areas of
intellectual property and to become better consumers. IPWatchdog.com
also leads the charge to inform individual inventors of invention
submission scams.
(PRWEB) September 12, 2007 -- Since IPWatchdog.com was originally
launched in October 1999, it has been owned and maintained by Gene
Quinn, a patent attorney, law professor, author and inventor. The site
has gained fame in the intellectual property community thanks to his
writing original articles on such subjects as patents, trademarks,
copyrights, trade secrets and invention submission. The site has
flourished in recent years, making it one of the most popular
intellectual property websites on the Internet. Now Quinn is selling
the site and domain name via auction.
Since 1999 IPWatchdog.com has provided individuals, small businesses
and entrepreneurs with information to help them understand all areas of
intellectual property and to become better consumers. In fact,
IPWatchdog.com leads the charge to inform individual inventors of
invention submission scams. Indeed, if you type "invention submission"
into Google, Yahoo or MSN, IPWatchdog.com's "The Truth About Invention
Submission," a detailed expose and warning, is the first page that
appears in the free rankings.
The Truth About Invention Submission
When asked why he is now selling IPWatchdog.com Quinn explained that
“it is time for me to move on. I am embarking on a new business
related to the mentored writing of patent applications via an
interactive software platform. With this new business I will not have
the time to dedicate to keeping IPWatchdog.com fresh. I have taken it
about as far as one person can. I will miss it no doubt, but it is
time.”
IPWatchdog.com has achieved extraordinary search engine ranking for
highly desirable terms in the competitive marketplace of intellectual
property advertising via the Internet. Paying for advertising through
pay-per-click models for desirable search terms relative to
intellectual property, particularly patents, ideas and inventions where
IPWatchdog.com scores best, routinely costs between $3 and $6 per click.
IPWatchdog.com is up for sale at SitePoint.com. The starting bid is
$10,000, but is expect to sell well above that price given that almost
19,000 unique visitors a month are gained by the site through free
search engine rankings and links across the Internet."[1]
So, I went to www.sitepoint.com. The first time you visit that site it
is a bit overwhelming. I found the marketplace section, bumbled around
through domains and established sites for sale and finally used the
site search and found it. IPwatchdog has a Page Rank of 6 with 84,000
page views per month. At this moment the bid is 15,000 with a Buy it
Now price of 250,000.[2] The site is for sale with all of its original
content.
So what is IPwatchdog worth?
According to WIPO, "There are four main value concepts, namely, owner
value, market value, fair value and tax value. Owner value often
determines the price in negotiated deals and is often led by a
proprietor’s view of value if he were deprived of the property. The
basis of market value is the assumption that if comparable property has
fetched a certain price, then the subject property will realize a price
something near to it. The fair value concept, in its essence, is
the desire to be equitable to both parties. It recognizes that the
transaction is not in the open market and that vendor and purchaser
have been brought together in a legally binding manner. Tax value has
been the subject of case law worldwide since the turn of the century
and is an esoteric practice. There are quasi-concepts of value which
impinge upon each of these main areas, namely, investment value,
liquidation value, and going concern value."[3]
The very cheery divorceinfo.com site has some pragmatic advice about
the market value concept, "The Market value 'method looks at other
transfers of similar property for which the price is known and makes
adjustments to determine what this property is worth. This method would
yield accurate results if you really could apply it, because you would
be (presumably) evaluating arm's length transactions involving
well-informed buyers spending real money and well-informed sellers
actually giving up their hard-won assets.
There are two fundamental problems with the market approach. First,
it's often difficult to find transactions that are comparable where the
actual purchase price is known. Many transfers of intellectual property
occur privately, and prices aren't published. Second, every transaction
is unique. The purchase price could be vastly different depending on
whether there is a covenant not to compete involved, which industry is
involved, or whether financing is involved. Also, as described below,
values change over time, sometimes dramatically."[4]
Well, back to the press release, it turns out there is a comparable
property to consider. "Many likely remember that the domain name
“Patents.com” was up for auction in May 2007 and before the
auction was closed the top bid was $350,000. The Internet Real Estate
Group ultimately purchased “Patents.com” for an undisclosed
amount reportedly between $1 to $2 million. While IPWatchdog.com
differs from Patents.com, Quinn points out that “it has broader
appeal in terms of traffic because it has traffic associated with
copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets as well as patent and
invention related traffic.” Quinn continued, “according to
both Alexa.com and Quantcast.com, IPWatchdog is far more popular than
Patents.com.” Quinn is also not just selling the domain name, but
the sale also includes the content of the site (unlike the Patents.com
sale), and he is willing to stay on in some capacity to ensure the
buyer meaningfully captures the good will he has built up with
IPWatchdog.com."[1]
Igor International describes the sale of patents.com:
"$350,000 is the high bid at the time of this post. The bid history and the highest bid now can be seen here.
For many years, the domain names patents.com and patents.net have
belonged to the law firm of Oppedahl & Larson LLP and were used to
provide information to individuals concerning patents and other aspects
of intellectual property law. Now, following the dissolution of
Oppedahl & Larson LLP, these two domain names are potentially
available for purchase. A winning bid is anticipated to be accepted on
or before June 15, 2007.
In 2004, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Trademark Trial and Appeal
Board's (TTAB) refusal to register the mark "patents.com" to the firm.
The court found that the proposed mark is "merely descriptive" and thus
patents.com is not eligible for trademark protection."[5]
So the differences right off the bat would be:
- Patents.com is a more narrow name, IPwatchog has a broader focus
- Patents.com carried the right for the domain name, but the name in business as a trademark is not eligible for protection
- IPwatchdog is currently functioning, Oppedhahl & Larson were not
- Mr Quinn, who essentially is IPwatchdog will agree to stay in some context at least for the transition
- September 2007 is a time of economic uncertainty, June 2007 was before the subprime mortage fallout
The bottom line
We really will not know what will happen for 15 days, but I certainly enjoyed reading IPwatchdog, it was one of those mail messages that gives you a smile when it comes into your inbox.
1 http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/09/prweb553064.htm
2 http://www.sitepoint.com/marketplace/auction/12764
3 http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/value_ip_intangible_assets.htm
4 http://www.divorceinfo.com/fambusintellectualproperty.htm
5 http://www.igorinternational.com/blog/2007/04/patentscom-domain-name-for-sale-by-auction/


